Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55173
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEkkasit Tharavichitkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorVicharn Lorvidhayaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPimkhuan Kamnerdsupaphonen_US
dc.contributor.authorVimol Sukthomyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomvilai Chakrabandhuen_US
dc.contributor.authorPitchayaponne Klunklinen_US
dc.contributor.authorWimrak Onchanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBongkoch Supawongwattanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNantaka Pukanhaphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorRazvan Galalaeen_US
dc.contributor.authorImjai Chitapanaruxen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T02:52:43Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T02:52:43Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-19en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712407en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84978916801en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12885-016-2558-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84978916801&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55173-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 The Author(s). Background: To report the results of combined chemoradiation (CCRT) with cisplatin versus carboplatin in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Methods: From 2009 to 2013, 255 patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical carcinoma, according to FIGO staging were prospectively assigned to be treated with pelvic radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy given concurrently with cisplatin or carboplatin in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Treatment outcomes and toxicitiy were evaluated. Results: Two-hundred and thirteen patients could be evaluated. At a median follow-up time of 43 months (6-69 months), the 3-year local control, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates were 93, 80.8, 85.0 and 87.3 %, respectively. No statistical difference in terms of local control, disease-free survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates between cisplatin and carboplatin treatments was observed in this study. Eighty-six percents of the patients in the carboplatin group could receive more than 4 cycles, while there were only 72 % in the cisplatin group who completed more than 4 cycles (p = 0. 02). In terms of acute toxicity, cisplatin caused significantly more anemia (p = 0.026), neutropenia (p = 0. 044) and nephrotoxicity (p = 0. 031) than carboplatin. No difference in late toxicity was observed in this study. Conclusion: Carboplatin yielded comparable results to cisplatin in concurrent chemo-radiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. In addition, carboplatin was associated with a better compliance rate and was associated with less of anemia, neutropenia and nephrotoxicity.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCombined chemoradiation of cisplatin versus carboplatin in cervical carcinoma: A single institution experience from Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBMC Canceren_US
article.volume16en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChristian-Albrechts-Universitat zu Kielen_US
article.stream.affiliationsEvangelical Clinics Gelsenkirchenen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.