Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55157
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKorakot Nganvongpaniten_US
dc.contributor.authorKittisak Buddhachaten_US
dc.contributor.authorJanine L. Brownen_US
dc.contributor.authorSarisa Klinhomen_US
dc.contributor.authorTanita Pitakarnnopen_US
dc.contributor.authorPasuk Mahakkanukrauhen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-05T02:52:29Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-05T02:52:29Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15590720en_US
dc.identifier.issn01634984en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84955622505en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s12011-016-0625-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84955622505&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/55157-
dc.description.abstract© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York. Sex assignment of human remains is a crucial step in forensic anthropological studies. The aim of this study was to examine elemental differences between male and female bones using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and determine if elemental profiling could be used for sex discrimination. Cranium, humerus, and os coxae of 60 skeletons (30 male, 30 female) from the Chiang Mai University Skeletal Collection were scanned by XRF and differences in elemental profiles between male and female bones determined using discriminant analysis. In the cranium, three elements (S, Ca, Pb) were significantly higher in males and five elements (Si, Mn, Fe, Zn, Ag) plus light elements (atomic number lower than 12) were higher in females. In humerus and os coxae, nine elements were significantly higher in male and one element was higher in female samples. The accuracy rate for sex estimation was 60, 63, and 61 % for cranium, humerus, and os coxae, respectively, and 67 % when data for all three bones were combined. We conclude that there are sex differences in bone elemental profiles; however, the accuracy of XRF analyses for discriminating between male and female samples was low compared to standard morphometric and molecular methods. XRF could be used on small samples that cannot be sexed by traditional morphological methods, but more work is needed to increase the power of this technique for gender assignment.en_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectChemistryen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePreliminary Study to Test the Feasibility of Sex Identification of Human (Homo sapiens) Bones Based on Differences in Elemental Profiles Determined by Handheld X-ray Fluorescenceen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBiological Trace Element Researchen_US
article.volume173en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNational Zoological Parken_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.