Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54831
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLakkana Thaikrueaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPotjaman Siriariyapornen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T10:24:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T10:24:35Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn10715754en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84946729764en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1097/WON.0000000000000190en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84946729764&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54831-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2015 by the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. BACKGROUND: The Toxic Jellyfi sh Network and its surveillance system were set up in 2008 and in 2009, respectively. Case investigations detected 3 cases with severe cutaneous injuries described in this article. CASES: There were 57 probable cases of box jellyfi sh stings between 2008 and 2013. Three of these injuries resulted in dermal necrosis, and 2 were associated with severe wound complications. A Thai man aged 21 years sustained wounds on his left knee and thigh. He received oral antibiotics and daily wet dressings; he did not receive steroids. He subsequently developed blisters, swelling of the lower left leg, neuritis, and severe itching in the later stages. Nevertheless, his wounds did not become infected and there was no keloid scarring. An American woman aged 25 years sustained stings on her right hand and arm. She received antibiotic ointment and a tape that was placed directly on the wound without any gauze or padding underneath. She developed a wound infection 2 weeks postinjury. Surgical debridement was required twice to remove necrotic tissue; keloid scars persisted on evaluation at 4 months. An American woman aged 33 years received stings on her left upper thigh. Initial treatment was provided by local residents, who crushed morning glory leaves to extract the juice and then applied the juice (mixed with water) to her wounds. She received intravenous steroids, oral antihistamines, oral analgesics, and antibiotic cream at the hospital. Despite this aggressive treatment, the wounds became gangrenous and surgical debridement was required to remove necrotic tissue. CONCLUSION: Clinicians need to be knowledgeable regarding the potentially serious wounds that can develop following jellyfi sh stings. Additional research is needed to identify best management approaches.en_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleSevere dermatonecrotic toxin and wound complications associated with box jellyfi sh stings 2008-2013en_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursingen_US
article.volume42en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.