Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54807
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrangmalee Leurcharusmeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorVanlapa Arnuntasupakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Chora De La Garzaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmorn Vijitpavanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSonia Ah-Kyeen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbhidej Saelaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorWorakamol Tiyaprasertkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoderick J. Finlaysonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Q.H. Tranen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T10:23:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T10:23:56Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15328651en_US
dc.identifier.issn10987339en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84945269307en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1097/AAP.0000000000000313en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945269307&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54807-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2015 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Background: The epidural space is most commonly identified with loss of resistance (LOR). Although sensitive, LOR lacks specificity, as cysts in interspinous ligaments, gaps in ligamentum flavum, paravertebral muscles, thoracic paravertebral spaces, and intermuscular planes can yield nonepidural LOR. Epidural waveform analysis (EWA) provides a simple confirmatory adjunct for LOR. When the needle is correctly positioned inside the epidural space, measurement of the pressure at its tip results in a pulsatile waveform. In this observational study, we set out to assess the sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values of EWA for thoracic epidural blocks. Methods: We enrolled a convenience sample of 160 patients undergoing thoracic epidural blocks for thoracic surgery, abdominal surgery, or rib fractures. The choice of patient position (sitting or lateral decubitus), approach (midline or paramedian), and LOR medium (air or normal saline) was left to the operator (attending anesthesiologist, fellow, or resident). After obtaining a satisfactory LOR, the operator injected 5 mL of normal saline through the epidural needle. A sterile tubing, connected to a pressure transducer, was attached to the needle to measure the pressure at the needle tip. A 4-mL bolus of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 5 ìg/mL was then administered and, after 10 minutes, the patient was assessed for sensory blockade to ice. Results: The failure rate (incorrect identification of the epidural space with LOR) was 23.1%. Of these 37 failed epidural blocks, 27 provided no sensory anesthesia at 10 minutes. In 10 subjects, the operator was unable to thread the catheter through the needle. When compared with the ice test, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of EWAwere 91.1%, 83.8%, 94.9%, and 73.8%, respectively. Conclusions: Epidural waveform analysis (with pressure transduction through the needle) provides a simple adjunct to LOR for thoracic epidural blocks. Although its use was devoid of complications, further confirmatory studies are required before its routine implementation in clinical practice.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleReliability of waveform analysis as an adjunct to loss of resistance for thoracic epidural blocksen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleRegional Anesthesia and Pain Medicineen_US
article.volume40en_US
article.stream.affiliationsMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal General Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMahidol Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.