Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54268
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Allen Movahed | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tommy Knöös | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Claire Foottit | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | André Haraldsson | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dirk Verellen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Koen Tournel | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sharon Qi | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dale Matson | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thuy Lau | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Milton Vargas | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Somsak Wanwilairat | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Christine Higby | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Osama Hassad | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Belal Moftah | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas Lacornerie | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Antoine Wagner | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hew Choon Soong | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-04T10:10:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-04T10:10:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-01-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 16800737 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-84944327994 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1007/978-3-319-19387-8_92 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84944327994&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/54268 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015. Determining the most desirable and achievable target dose and organ at risk (OAR) sparing using helical TomoTherapy planning system for mesothelioma treatment plans. A range of planning parameters was used. The reviewers’ ranking assessment (Ranking in Groups: 1 = Good, 2 = Above Average, 3 = Average, 4 = Poor).The overall rankings revealed that a plan with a balanced tradeoff among all planning objectives was preferred by most participants and reviewers. Other studies found low doses to the contralateral lung to be limiting. This was not the case in our study, with TomoTherapy we found the dose to contra lateral lung to be as low as V5Gy=0.87%. A pitch value of 0.287 or 0.43 would provide better result. A delivered modulation factor of above 1.7 and a treatment time around 500 sec will be beneficial consideration in planning. | en_US |
dc.subject | Chemical Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Engineering | en_US |
dc.title | International multi-institutional bench mark study on dosimetric and volumetric modulation using helical tomotherapy treatment planning for malignant pleural mesothelioma tumors | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Proceeding | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | IFMBE Proceedings | en_US |
article.volume | 51 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Lunds Universitet | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Skånes universitetssjukhus | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | The Ottawa Hospital | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | GammaWest Cancer Services | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Centro Oncológico de | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Centre Oscar Lambret | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Sime Darby Medical Centre Subang Jaya | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.