Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53982
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNattakarn Awaiwanonten_US
dc.contributor.authorFrans J M Smuldersen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeter Paulsenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T10:06:15Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T10:06:15Z-
dc.date.issued2015-09-03en_US
dc.identifier.issn09567135en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84907188607en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.08.043en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84907188607&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53982-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. European Union legislation limits for Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods are based on whether or not foods favour the multiplication of this bacterium. The latter is defined by criteria for water activity (aw), pH and shelf-life. We studied a peculiar group of traditional Austrian meats implicated in foodborne listeriosis made from cured cooked comminuted meat with gelatin/aspic (Presswurst), blood (Blutwurst) or fat as a binder (Leberpate´, Streichwurst, Zwiebelstreichwurst). Average pH values were 5.74 ± 0.45; 6.62 ± 0.31; 6.18 ± 0.36; 6.19 ± 0.15; 6.28 ± 0.04 for Presswurst (n = 15), Blutwurst (n = 15), Leberpate´ (n = 10), Streichwurst (n = 18) and Zwiebelstreichwurst (n = 3), respectively. Corresponding awvalues were: 0.968 ± 0.004; 0.965 ± 0.004; 0.961 ± 0.005; 0.963 ± 0.003 and 0.957 ± 0.005. There were no statistically significant differences of pH among spreadable meat products. Presswurst had significantly lower pH values, but a significantly higher level of lactic acid bacteria. With the exception of one low pH Presswurst sample, all foods under study would favour the growth of L. monocytogenes. In a 9 days challenge test, Blutwurst showed a strong potential for supporting L. monocytogenes growth (2.4-4.6 log). In contrast, Presswurst was not able to support growth in all temperatures tested. A pH vs. awchart was designed delineating the growth/no-growth border (defined as 0.43 log increase over 216 h) at 2, 4 and 8 °C. For a given sample (i.e. a pH/awdata pair), it could be easily assessed if the product would likely be "safe" for 9 days at temperatures of <2 °C, 2-4 °C etc. by simply plotting the data point in the chart. Agreement of predicted bacterial growth and multiplication in food samples was studied in one Presswurst and three Blutwurst products. In our conservative approach, additional anti-listerial effects of lactic acid bacteria and food additives were not considered, but could be integrated, if desired. The usefulness of such a pH vs. awchart for small businesses, the competent authority and for didactic purposes is discussed.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleGrowth potential of Listeria monocytogenes in traditional Austrian cooked-cured meat productsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleFood Controlen_US
article.volume50en_US
article.stream.affiliationsVeterinarmedizinische Universitat Wienen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.