Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53824
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDocile Saguanen_US
dc.contributor.authorGina Northingtonen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrawee Chinthakananen_US
dc.contributor.authorCatherine Hudsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeborah Karpen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:58:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:58:53Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14333023en_US
dc.identifier.issn09373462en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84904745507en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00192-014-2330-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84904745507&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53824-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a history of previous pelvic surgery is associated with lower urinary tract (LUT) injury at the time of pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery from 2006 to 2011 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups: those with previous pelvic surgery and those without previous pelvic surgery. A sample size analysis was performed to determine the number needed to detect at least a 3-fold difference in the rate of LUT injury. Demographic, historical, clinical, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed. Associations between LUT injury and demographics, previous pelvic surgery, or other clinical risk factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: 685 women were included in the analysis: 514 (74.9 %) with and 171 (25.1 %) without prior pelvic surgery. The overall rate of LUT injury was 6 %. Of the injuries, 3.2 % were cystotomies, and 1.9 % were ureteral obstructions. Previous pelvic surgery did not significantly affect the rate of LUT injury (OR 0.76, 95%CI 0.38-1.54). A diagnosis of prolapse, concurrent hysterectomy, anterior repair, and apical repair were significantly associated with LUT injury. After controlling for age and race, a diagnosis of prolapse remained significantly associated with LUT injury (OR 3.38, 95 % CI 1.11-14.75). Conclusions: Prior pelvic surgery does not affect the rate of LUT injury in pelvic reconstructive surgery. The diagnosis of prolapse is a risk factor for LUT injury in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery. © 2014 The International Urogynecological Association.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleIatrogenic lower urinary tract injury at the time of pelvic reconstructive surgery: Does previous pelvic surgery increase the risk?en_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctionen_US
article.volume25en_US
article.stream.affiliationsPermanente Medical Groupen_US
article.stream.affiliationsEmory University School of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.