Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53738
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTanyanan Tanawuttiwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorBrian P. O'Neillen_US
dc.contributor.authorMauricio G. Cohenen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrawee Chinthakananen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlan W. Heldmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorClaudia A. Martinezen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarlos E. Alfonsoen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaul D. Mitranien_US
dc.contributor.authorConrad J. Maconen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoger G. Carrilloen_US
dc.contributor.authorDonald B. Williamsen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliam W. O'Neillen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert J. Myerburgen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:56:52Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:56:52Z-
dc.date.issued2014-04-22en_US
dc.identifier.issn15583597en_US
dc.identifier.issn07351097en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84902096270en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.046en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902096270&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/53738-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study sought to determine the incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with different methods of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) - transfemoral (TF), transapical (TA), and transaortic (TAo) catheter-based valve replacement and conventional surgical approaches. Background: The relative incidences of AF associated with the various access routes for AVR have not been well characterized. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we evaluated a total of 231 consecutive patients who underwent AVR for degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) between March 2010 and September 2012. Patients with a history of paroxysmal, persistent, or chronic AF, with bicuspid aortic valves, and patients who died within 48 h after AVR were excluded. A total of 123 patients (53% of total group) qualified for inclusion. Data on documented episodes of new-onset AF, along with all clinical, echocardiographic, procedural, and 30-day follow-up data, were collated. Results: AF occurred in 52 patients (42.3%). AF incidence varied according to the procedural method. AF occurred in 60% of patients who underwent surgical AVR (SAVR), in 53% after TA-TAVR, in 33% after TAo-TAVR cases, and 14% after TF-TAVR. The episodes occurred at a median time interval of 53 (25th to 75th percentile, 41 to 87) h after completion of the procedure. Procedures without pericardiotomy had an 82% risk reduction of AF compared with those with pericardiotomy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.05 to 0.59). Conclusions: AF was a common complication of AVR with a cumulative incidence of >40% in elderly patients with degenerative AS who underwent either SAVR or TAVR. AF was most common with SAVR and least common with TF-TAVR. Procedures without pericardiotomy were associated with a lower incidence of AF. © 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleNew-onset atrial fibrillation after aortic valve replacement: Comparison of transfemoral, transapical, transaortic, and surgical approachesen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of the American College of Cardiologyen_US
article.volume63en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsTemple Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsHenry Ford Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.