Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52971
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenchalak Maneetonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNarong Maneetonen_US
dc.contributor.authorManit Srisurapanonten_US
dc.contributor.authorKaweesak Chittawatanaraten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:35:46Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:35:46Z-
dc.date.issued2013-07-23en_US
dc.identifier.issn11778881en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84880736264en_US
dc.identifier.other10.2147/DDDT.S45575en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84880736264&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52971-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Atypical antipsychotic drugs may have low propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects in delirious patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability between quetiapine and haloperidol in controlling delirious behavior. Methods: A 7-day prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted from June 2009 to April 2011 in medically ill patients with delirium. Measures used for daily assessment included the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98 (DRS-R-98) and total sleep time. The Clinical Global Impression, Improvement (CGI-I) and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson-Angus Scale were applied daily. The primary outcome was the DRS-R-98 severity scores. The data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Fifty-two subjects (35 males and 17 females) were randomized to receive 25-100 mg/day of quetiapine (n = 24) or 0.5-2.0 mg/day of haloperidol (n = 28). Mean (standard deviation) doses of quetiapine and haloperidol were 67.6 (9.7) and 0.8 (0.3) mg/day, respectively. Over the trial period, means (standard deviation) of the DRS-R-98 severity scores were not significantly different between the quetiapine and haloperidol groups (-22.9 [6.9] versus -21.7 [6.7]; P = 0.59). The DRS-R-98 noncognitive and cognitive subscale scores were not significantly different. At end point, the response and remission rates, the total sleep time, and the Modified (nine-item) Simpson-Angus scores were also not significantly different between groups. Hypersomnia was common in the quetiapine-treated patients (33.3%), but not significantly higher than that in the haloperidol-treated group (21.4%). Limitations: Patients were excluded if they were not able to take oral medications, and the sample size was small. Conclusion: Low-dose quetiapine and haloperidol may be equally effective and safe for controlling delirium symptoms. © 2013 Maneeton et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleQuetiapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of delirium: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleDrug Design, Development and Therapyen_US
article.volume7en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.