Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52810
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSurasak Saokaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorUnchalee Permsuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNathorn Chaiyakunapruken_US
dc.contributor.authorSurakit Nathisuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorApichard Sukonthasarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorNapawan Jeanpeerapongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:32:43Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:32:43Z-
dc.date.issued2013-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18792472en_US
dc.identifier.issn00493848en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84885179289en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.thromres.2013.08.019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84885179289&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52810-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Although pharmacist-participated warfarin therapy management (PWTM) is well established, the economic evaluation of PWTM is still lacking particularly in Asia-Pacific region. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of PWTM in Thailand using local data where available. Methods A Markov model was used to compare lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) accrued to patients receiving warfarin therapy through PWTM or usual care (UC). The model was populated with relevant information from both health care system and societal perspectives. Input data were obtained from literatures and database analyses. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were presented as year 2012 values. A base-case analysis was performed for patients at age 45 years old. Sensitivity analyses including one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were constructed to determine the robustness of the findings. Results From societal perspective, PWTM and UC results in 39.5 and 38.7 QALY, respectively. Thus, PWTM increase QALY by 0.79, and increase costs by 92,491 THB (3,083 USD) compared with UC (ICER 116,468 THB [3,882.3 USD] per QALY gained). While, from health care system perspective, PWTM also results in 0.79 QALY, and increase costs by 92,788 THB (3,093 USD) compared with UC (ICER 116,842 THB [3,894.7 USD] per QALY gained). Thus, PWTM was cost-effective compared with usual care, assuming willingness-to-pay (WTP) of 150,000 THB/QALY. Results were sensitive to the discount rate and cost of clinic set-up. Conclusion Our finding suggests that PWTM is a cost-effective intervention. Policy-makers may consider our finding as part of information in their decision-making for implementing this strategy into healthcare benefit package. Further updates when additional data available are needed. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of pharmacist-participated warfarin therapy management in Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleThrombosis Researchen_US
article.volume132en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Phayaoen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNaresuan Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsDiscipline of Pharmacyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Queenslanden_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Wisconsin Madisonen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMahidol Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBuddhachinaraj Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.