Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52782
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSurinporn Likhitsathianen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanok Uttawichaien_US
dc.contributor.authorHathaichonnee Booncharoenen_US
dc.contributor.authorApisak Wittayanookulluken_US
dc.contributor.authorChaisiri Angkurawaranonen_US
dc.contributor.authorManit Srisurapanonten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T09:32:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T09:32:12Z-
dc.date.issued2013-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18790046en_US
dc.identifier.issn03768716en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84887026434en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.032en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887026434&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/52782-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Initiation of a relapse prevention medication is crucial at the end of alcohol detoxification. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of topiramate for alcoholism in patients receiving a residential treatment program of alcohol detoxification and post-acute treatment. Methods: This was a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate for alcoholism in patients receiving a residential treatment program. Individuals with DSM-IV alcohol dependence with minimal withdrawal were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either 100-300. mg/day of topiramate or placebo. Primary outcomes were given as percentages of heavy drinking days and time to first day of heavy drinking. Other drinking outcomes, craving, and health-related quality of life were evaluated. Results: A total of 106 participants were randomized to receive topiramate (n=53) or placebo (n=53). Twenty-eight participants of the topiramate group (52.8%) and 25 participants of the placebo group (47.2%) completed the study. Averaged over the trial period, there was no significant difference between groups on the mean percentages of heavy drinking days [1.96 (-1.62 to 5.54), p=.28]. Log rank survival analysis found no difference of time to first day of heavy drinking between topiramate and placebo groups (61.8 vs. 57.5 days, respectively; χ2=0.61, d.f.=1, p=.81). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions: By using a conservative model for data analysis, we could not detect the effectiveness of topiramate in this particular population. As the sensitivity analysis showed a trend of its benefit, further studies in larger sample sizes are still warranted. © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titleTopiramate treatment for alcoholic outpatients recently receiving residential treatment programs: A 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleDrug and Alcohol Dependenceen_US
article.volume133en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThanyarak Chiang Mai Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSaunprung Psychiatric Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.