Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51857
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPenprapa Sivirojen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarl Peltzeren_US
dc.contributor.authorSupa Pengpiden_US
dc.contributor.authorSompong Morariten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T06:10:41Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T06:10:41Z-
dc.date.issued2012-08-07en_US
dc.identifier.issn14712458en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84864501417en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/1471-2458-12-608en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84864501417&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51857-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Road traffic accidents are the second largest cause of burden of disease in Thailand, largely attributable to behavioural risk factors including drinking and driving, speeding, substance abuse and failure to use seatbelts. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of non-seatbelt use among drivers during Songkran festival in Thailand. Methods. A cross-sectional survey has been performed to determine the prevalence of seatbelt use among Thai drivers (N=13722) during four days of the Songkran festival. For this sample the population of drivers was consecutively selected from 12 petrol stations in four provinces from each of the four main geographical regions of Thailand. The study was conducted at petrol stations at roads in town, outside town and highway at different time intervals when trained field staff administered a structured questionnaire and performed an observation checklist on seat belt use. Results: An overall prevalence of 28.4% of non-seatbelt use among drivers was found. In multivariable analysis demographics (being male, younger age, coming from the Northern or Southern region in Thailand), environmental factors (earlier during the Songkran festival, in the morning and late evening and on main roads in town), seatbelt use experiences and attitudes (having been in an accident before, never having used a seatbelt, no intention to use a seatbelt, lack of awareness of danger of non-seatbelt use and lower perceived risk of being caught with non-seatbelt use) and lower exposure to road safety awareness (RSA) campaign (less frequent exposure to RSA campaign, less frequent following of RTI statistics and not talking with others about the RSA campaign) were associated with non-seatbelt use. Conclusion: Rates of non-seatbelt use by Thai drivers during Songkran festival was 28.4%. Lower exposure to the RSA campaign was found to be associated with non-seatbelt use among drivers during the Songkran festival. © 2012 Siviroj et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleNon-seatbelt use and associated factors among Thai drivers during Songkran festivalen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBMC Public Healthen_US
article.volume12en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsHuman Sciences Research Council of South Africaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of the Free Stateen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMU)en_US
article.stream.affiliationsThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.