Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51696
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatrick Huntjensen_US
dc.contributor.authorLouis Lebelen_US
dc.contributor.authorClaudia Pahl-Wostlen_US
dc.contributor.authorJeff Camkinen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoland Schulzeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNicole Kranzen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T06:06:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T06:06:30Z-
dc.date.issued2012-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn09593780en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84856023605en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856023605&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/51696-
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides an evidence-based contribution to understanding processes of climate change adaptation in water governance systems in the Netherlands, Australia and South Africa. It builds upon the work of Ostrom on institutional design principles for local common pool resources systems. We argue that for dealing with complexities and uncertainties related to climate change impacts (e.g. increased frequency and intensity of floods or droughts) additional or adjusted institutional design propositions are necessary that facilitate learning processes. This is especially the case for dealing with complex, cross-boundary and large-scale resource systems, such as river basins and delta areas in the Netherlands and South Africa or groundwater systems in Western Australia. In this paper we provide empirical support for a set of eight refined and extended institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector. Together they capture structural, agency and learning dimensions of the adaptation challenge and they provide a strong initial framework to explore key institutional issues in the governance of adaptation to climate change. These institutional design propositions support a " management as learning" approach to dealing with complexity and uncertainty. They do not specify blueprints, but encourage adaptation tuned to the specific features of local geography, ecology, economies and cultures. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleInstitutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sectoren_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleGlobal Environmental Changeen_US
article.volume22en_US
article.stream.affiliationsWageningen University and Research Centreen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversitat Osnabrucken_US
article.stream.affiliationsWestern Australian Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of KwaZulu-Natalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsGerman International Cooperation (GIZ)en_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.