Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50263
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilaiwan Chongruksuten_US
dc.contributor.authorBannakij Lojanapiwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorVorvat Choomsai Na Ayudhyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChamaiporn Tawichasrien_US
dc.contributor.authorJayanton Patumanonden_US
dc.contributor.authorSomboon Paichitvicheanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-04T04:27:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-04T04:27:23Z-
dc.date.issued2011-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-79953689320en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79953689320&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/50263-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is widely used worldwide to treat kidney stone because it is without invasive and can be done on an outpatient basis. However, not all patients are treated successfully. The success of kidney stone treatment by ESWL depends on several factors. Objective: To investigate prognostic factors for the successful treatment of kidney stones by ESWL. Material and Method: A prospective cohort study was made of 394 patients with kidney stone who underwent ESWL using Storz SLX-20 Lithotripter at Chiang Mai University Hospital between June 2008 and October 2009. All patients were followed up for three months after treatment to evaluate treatment success. Success was defined as the presence of clinically insignificant residual fragments less than or equal to 4 mm or complete clearance of the stones. Data were analyzed using exponential risk regression to determine the prognostic factors of ESWL treatment success. Results: The ESWL treatment success rate was 81.2%. The stone free (SF) rate was 56.4%. The clinically insignificant residual fragment (CIRF) rate was 24.8%. The median number of ESWL treatment sessions was two (IQR = 2-4). Multivariable exponential risk regression analysis demonstrated that the statistically significant prognostic factors for ESWL treatment were stone size < 15 mm (IRR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.13-2.05, p = 0.005), stone location (renal pelvis had a higher success rate than lower calyx; IRR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.01-1.72, p = 0.028) and a single stone (IRR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.02-1.79, p = 0.035). Conclusion: Stone size, stone location, and stone number were prognostic factors in determining the success of ESWL treatment.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePrognostic factors for success in treating kidney stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of the Medical Association of Thailanden_US
article.volume94en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNakornping Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.