Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/80229
Title: The Stability and success of dental implants in extracted sockets preservation using alloplastic biomaterial: a randomized clinical trial
Other Titles: เสถียรภาพและความสำเร็จของรากฟันเทียมในกระดูกเบ้าฟันที่ถูกถอนไปโดยใช้วัสดุปลูกถ่ายเฉื่อย : การทดลองทางคลินิกแบบสุ่ม
Authors: Pawika Dansubutra
Authors: Pathawee Khongkhunthian
Weerapan Aunmeungthong
Pawika Dansubutra
Keywords: Implant stability;Implant success;Socket preservation;Alloplastic biomaterial;Biphasic calcium phosphate;M-Bone
Issue Date: May-2023
Publisher: Chiang Mai : Graduate School, Chiang Mai University
Abstract: Objectives: To compare the stability and success of dental implants placed in sockets preserved with alloplastic biomaterials to those placed in naturally healed sockets. Materials and Methods: Randomly recruited patients with single-rooted non-restorable teeth were separated into two groups. Both groups underwent minimally traumatic extraction. In the test group, socket preservation was performed using an alloplastic biomaterial called biphasic calcium phosphate (M bone, National Science and Technology Development Agency: NSTDA). The control group's socket was allowed to heal naturally. After 6 months of healing, dental implants were placed in the socket site. Implant stability was measured, and a periapical radiograph was taken on the day of implant placement, prosthesis loading day, 6 months, and 12 months after prosthesis loading. The data was analyzed to determine implant stability, success rate, and radiographic bone loss. Results: There is no significant difference in the implant stability quotient (ISQ) between the two groups during every follow-up period. However, when comparing within the control group, the ISQ at 6 and 12 months after prosthesis placement showed significant differences from the day of implant placement (p < 0.05). The ISQ in the test group increased over time, but not significantly. The implant success rate in the control group was 8 out of 10 implants, while in the test group, it was 8 out of 11 implants. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 1.00). Radiographic bone loss was observed during the 1-year follow-up after prosthesis loading, with the control group experiencing 0.33±0.31 mm of bone loss, and the test group experiencing 0.69±0.41 mm of bone loss. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
URI: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/80229
Appears in Collections:DENT: Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
610931026-Pawika Dansubutra.pdf1.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.