การบริหารจัดการการให้สัญชาติไทยและสถานะบุคคลแก่บุคคลไม่มีสถานะทางทะเบียน กรณีศึกษาอำเภอปาย จังหวัดแม่ฮ่องสอน

Abstract

Management of Granting the Citizenship and Individual Status to the Person without Registration Status: A Case Study of Pai District, Mae Hong Son Province has 2 objectives; of this study were as follows; (1) to study management methods and (2) to The effectiveness of management according to the strategy to manage problems of status and rights of individuals in Pai District Mae Hong Son Province. The qualitative research method was used to collect data from two resources including secondary data obtained from a documentary study and primary data obtained from in-depth interviews and participant observation. Two groups of key informants were interviewed with 12 offices and 16 persons without registration status. For study method based on Policy Implementation Policy Evaluation and New Public Management: NPM. The findings are cabinet resolution on 18 January 2005, 7 December 2010, and 26 January 2021 was converted into the announcement of the Ministry of Interior. They can be divided into the following issues: 1) The administration of granting Thai nationality and obtaining an alien status to enter lawful immigration for persons without registration status in the Pai District. Mae Hong Son Province Both in terms of management with good management processes and determinants of successful policy implementation. 2) Effectiveness of the Implementation of the Strategic Management of Status and Rights Problems of Individuals in Pai District Mae Hong Son is productive. But the appropriateness criteria for the reasons summarized above as bad policies are caused by limitations in target groups that have not been explored and developed or updated. But if it is updated, then the researcher believes that the number of persons does not have the registration status of Pai District. Mae Hong Son Province will have several less than 4,408 people, according to which there has been a survey and a history register from the beginning. In addition, the researcher proposed two problems and obstacles: the first issue was Problems and obstacles for the operators, that is, while the status and rights of persons without registration status have been improved accordingly, the welfare The progression path of practitioners, especially those working on nationality and personal status that are not developed according to And another issue is the problem of obstacles for people without registration status who do not have a domicile. As a result, there was a lack of witnesses in the area to testify and did not receive sufficient information publicity. In addition, information has been recorded in the wrong history register, resulting in no credibility, and cannot be used as other reference evidence. Suggestions on the issue are 1) there should be a readiness survey of practitioners or ask practitioners' opinions on the policy, 2) reduce restrictions on the exchange of necessary information, and 3) they should alway a regular review of the criteria qualifications.