Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76986
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThanat Kanthawangen_US
dc.contributor.authorJannis Boddenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGabby B. Josephen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas Vailen_US
dc.contributor.authorDerek Warden_US
dc.contributor.authorRina Patelen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas M. Linken_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:21:08Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:21:08Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14322161en_US
dc.identifier.issn03642348en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85105527845en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s00256-021-03795-8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85105527845&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76986-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To assess the value of preoperative joint aspiration in detecting periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty and to compare these with the clinical findings, serum markers, and intraoperative findings. Materials and methods: Fluoroscopically guided hip aspirations in patients with pain after hip arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed from January 2014 to December 2018. All hips underwent subsequent revision hip arthroplasty. Antibiotics were discontinued at least 2 weeks before the aspiration. The 2018 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria served as a standard of reference for PJI. Clinical, serum, synovial, and intraoperative parameters were recorded in all patients. Correlations between all parameters with PJI diagnosis were analyzed using linear and logistic regression models with ROC analysis. Results: In 202 hips that included 91 septic hips, hip aspiration (AUC = 0.78) and intraoperative (0.80) parameters performed better than serum-based tests (0.64) and clinical parameters (0.68) in detecting PJI. Using MSIS criteria as a standard of reference, hip aspiration had a sensitivity of 64.0% and an accuracy of 78.5% for cultures and a sensitivity of 74.2% and an accuracy of 82.1% for synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils% (PMN%). Results substantially improved sensitivity after excluding patients that were treated with antibiotics, particularly culture results. Conclusions: Preoperative hip aspiration showed good diagnostic performance in diagnosing PJI compared with MSIS criteria as a standard of reference. But a negative result from aspirate could not rule out PJI. Based on our findings, hip aspiration is an essential test for treatment planning in patients with pain after hip arthroplasty.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDiagnostic value of fluoroscopy-guided hip aspiration for periprosthetic joint infectionen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleSkeletal Radiologyen_US
article.volume50en_US
article.stream.affiliationsKlinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität Münchenen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of California, San Franciscoen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.