Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76716
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStephen L. Aitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorQuanhathai Kaewpoowaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSaowaluck Yasrien_US
dc.contributor.authorAmaraporn Rerkasemen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittipan Rerkasemen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanejit Choovuthayakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomsanguan Ausayakhunen_US
dc.contributor.authorKevin Robertsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert M. Rothen_US
dc.contributor.authorNathaniel M. Robbinsen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:15:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:15:50Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15382443en_US
dc.identifier.issn13550284en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85109032701en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s13365-021-00991-zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109032701&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76716-
dc.description.abstractThere is a growing need for brief screening measures for HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders (HAND). We compared two commonly used measures (the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] and the International HIV Dementia Scale [IHDS]) in their ability to identify asymptomatic HAND (i.e., asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment [ANI]). Participants included 74 Thai PLWH: 38 met Frascati criteria for ANI and 36 were cognitively normal (CN). Participants completed Thai language versions of the MoCA (MoCA-T) and IHDS, and a validated neurocognitive battery. We examined between-group differences for MoCA-T and IHDS total scores, and scale subcomponents. We also conducted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to determine the ability of the MoCA-T and IHDS to discriminate between CN and ANI groups, and compared their area under the curve (AUC) values. Results revealed lower MoCA-T total score, as well as the Visuospatial/Executive and Delayed Recall subtask scores, in the ANI relative to CN group. Groups did not differ on the IHDS. For ROC analyses, the MoCA-T, but not the IHDS, significantly differentiated the ANI from CN group, and there was a significant difference in AUC values between the MoCA-T (AUC =.71) and IHDS (AUC =.56). Sensitivity and specificity statistics were poor for both screening measures. These data indicate while the MoCA-T functions better than the IHDS in detecting Thai PLWH with ANI, the mildest form of HAND, neither cognitive screener, showed strong utility. Our findings reflect the limited efficacy of common screening measures in detecting subtler cognitive deficits among Thai PLWH, and highlight the need for better screening tools.en_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNeuroscienceen_US
dc.titlePsychometric utility of the international HIV dementia scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in HIV-associated asymptomatic neurocognitive impairmenten_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of NeuroVirologyen_US
article.volume27en_US
article.stream.affiliationsThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hillen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouthen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.