Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76386
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaninut Phienwejen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarasri Chaiworawitkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorDhirawat Jotikasthiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrit Khwanngernen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatiyut Sriwilasen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:09:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:09:24Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15451569en_US
dc.identifier.issn10556656en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85120545993en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1177/10556656211055642en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120545993&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76386-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the use of a computer simulation by Mimics software and the water displacement method as means for measurement of alveolar cleft volume on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. Design: Prospective study. Settling: Institutional research. Patients: Patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCCLP) who would undergo alveolar bone grafting. Interventions: CBCT images of twenty patients with UCCLP were included in the study. In the first method, the water displacement method was adopted to measure volume of plasticine filled in the alveolar cleft imprinted on 3D printed model of maxilla. In the second method a volumetric assessment function in Mimics software was adopted to measure volume of 3D virtual model of alveolar cleft constructed from CBCT images. A comparison on the alveolar cleft volumes derived from the two methods was assessed using the statistical paired t-test. Main Outcome Measure: The paired-t test showed no statistically significant difference between alveolar cleft volumes measured by the two methods (P = 0.075). Results: Mean volume of the alveolar cleft measured by the water displacement method was 1.03 ± 0.31 ml whereas by the computer simulation using Mimics software the value was 1.00 ± 0.31 ml. The mean difference between the two methods was 0.03 ± 0.08 ml. Conclusion: The computer simulation by Mimics software as a means for measurement of alveolar cleft volume on CBCT data is as accurate as the measurement by the water displacement method.en_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleComparison of Preoperative Measurement Methods of Alveolar Cleft Volume Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography between Computer Simulation and Water Displacement Methodsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleCleft Palate-Craniofacial Journalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSiriraj Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.