Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76255
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNwe Ni Sein Myinten_US
dc.contributor.authorWipada Kunaviktikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorThitinut Akkadechanunten_US
dc.contributor.authorOrn Anong Wichaikhumen_US
dc.contributor.authorSue Turaleen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:07:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:07:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn13652648en_US
dc.identifier.issn03092402en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85135265845en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1111/jan.15401en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135265845&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76255-
dc.description.abstractAim: Retaining nurses on the job is vital, and their successful retention is related to the organizational climates (OC) of healthcare settings. The purpose was to develop and test the psychometric properties of the Perceived Organizational Climate Scale (POCS). Design: The methodologic research design was used by following the scale development strategies by DeVellis (2017). The conceptual framework for this study was based on the broader theoretical framework of the Competing Value Framework (CVF) of Quinn et al. (2015), the concept analysis and extensive literature review (1939–2018), and combined with the inductive qualitative data. Methods: A two-phase study of scale construction and psychometric testing was conducted for content validation, construct validation and internal consistency reliabilities of the instrument. An expert panel validated the 4-point scale, followed by exploratory factor analysis, the known-group approach and split groups. Data were collected from (1161) registered nurses in eight general hospitals across Myanmar from August 2019 to September 2020. Results: The 35 items with four essential dimensions: transformational climate, bureaucratic climate, team climate and strategic climate, explained almost 50% of the variation with all factor loading greater than.40. The internal consistency reliabilities of the instrument showed the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of.93, and the dimensions were from.82 to.85. As hypothesized, the known-group approach demonstrated that experienced nurses had higher mean scores than novices. The internal consistency reliabilities of the scale and dimensions across the splitting groups illustrated the stability. Conclusion: This evidence supports this instrument as having satisfactory initial psychometric properties with a comprehensive picture of OC by its essential components contributing to an inclusive understanding of this climate globally. Impact: This instrument can be used as an objective tool for evaluating OC as perceived by nurses in healthcare settings to inform improvements in working environments.en_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and psychometric testing of the Perceived Organizational Climate Scale for nursesen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Advanced Nursingen_US
article.volume78en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMinistry of Health and Sportsen_US
article.stream.affiliationsPanyapiwat Institute of Managementen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.