Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76113
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPallop Siewchaisakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirinya Nanthanangkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirapat Longkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPongdech Sarakarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorJukkrit Wungrathen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:05:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:05:45Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18749445en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85138596904en_US
dc.identifier.other10.2174/18749445-v15-e2206100en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138596904&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76113-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Few studies have developed tools to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine literacy (VL), especially in Asia. In this study, an online tool was utilized to assess COVID-19 VL, vaccine fear (VF), vaccine hesitancy (VH), and vaccine acceptance (VA) among village health volunteers (VHVs) in Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional online questionnaire was distributed to 210 VHVs between 10th to 14th September, 2021 to assess their VL, VF, VH, and VA levels. Item objective congruence (IOC) and Cronbach’s alpha were used to estimate the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The two-independent sample t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, ANOVA, and the Kruskal-Wallis test were employed to compare differences between the scores. Pearson correlation and Spearman’s rank correlation were used to estimate the correlation of the scores. Results: The online questionnaire showed high validity, with IOC values over 0.70 and reliability over 0.87 for all items. Median scores of VL, VF, and VH for the 210 participants were high (VL 2.92 and VF 2.5 out of a maximum of 4, and VH 2.43 out of a maximum of 5). The mean VA score was low (0.21 out of a maximum of 1) and significantly different between demographic variables. A significant correlation was found between VL and VH and VF and VA. Conclusion: The online questionnaire showed high values of validity and reliability. This tool proved to be beneficial for evaluating VL, VF, VH, and VA in Thailand. Further studies using a larger population are required to verify these results.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleA Validation and Feasibility of a Questionnaire to Assess Literacy, Fear, Hesitancy, and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine in Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleOpen Public Health Journalen_US
article.volume15en_US
article.stream.affiliationsKhon Kaen Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThailand Ministry of Public Healthen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThammasat Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsASEAN Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research Groupen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.