Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76061
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWachiranun Sirikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChanodom Piankusolen_US
dc.contributor.authorBorwon Wittayachamnankulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSattha Riyapanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirapong Supasaovapaken_US
dc.contributor.authorWachira Wongtanasarasinen_US
dc.contributor.authorBryan McNallyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:04:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:04:54Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn26665204en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85128990909en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100196en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128990909&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76061-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to explore significant pre-hospital factors affecting the survivability of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) patients in countries with developing EMS systems. Method: A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining data from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2020 from Utstein Registry databases in Thailand, collected through Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS). Data were collected from three centres, including regional, suburban-capital, and urban-capital hospitals. The primary endpoint of this study was 30-day survival or discharged alive after an OHCA event. The multivariable risk regression was done by modified Poisson regression with robust error variance to explore the association between 30-day survival and pre-hospital factors with potential confounders adjustments. Findings: Of 1,240 OHCA cases transferred by Emergency Medical Services (EMS), 42 patients (3.4%) were discharged alive after 30 days, including 22 (8.6%), 8 (3.0%), and 12 (1.7%) from regional, suburban-capital, and urban-capital centres, respectively. The initial arrest rhythm was 89.7% unshockable, with no significant variations across the three centres. Overall, bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was 40.4%. However, bystander CPR with Automated External Defibrillator (AED) application was 0.8%. Bystander CPR significantly increased 30-day survival probability (aRR 1.88, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.51; p 0.049). Additionally, reducing the EMS response time by one minute significantly increased OHCA survivability (aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20; p 0.001). Conclusions: Response time and bystander CPR are the factors that improve the 30-day survival outcomes of OHCA patients. In contrast, scene time, transport time, and pre-hospital advanced airway management didn't improve 30-day OHCA survival.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleA retrospective multi-centre cohort study: Pre-hospital survival factors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in Thailanden_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleResuscitation Plusen_US
article.volume9en_US
article.stream.affiliationsSiriraj Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsRajavithi Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsEmory University School of Medicineen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.