Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76012
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVikram Mohanen_US
dc.contributor.authorJonathan Branneyen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarol Clarken_US
dc.contributor.authorRebecca Nealen_US
dc.contributor.authorMadhanagopal Jagannathanen_US
dc.contributor.authorAatit Paungmalien_US
dc.contributor.authorMaria Perrien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:04:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:04:15Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn23988835en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85130601691en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/hsr2.661en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130601691&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/76012-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Aims: The evaluation of breathing function is crucial in the clinical examination of the respiratory system. The Total Faulty Breathing Scale (TFBS) could be used in clinical settings to quantify the measurement of breathing dysfunction. Reliability data for the TFBS are available for males, but there is a requirement to determine reliability for females and to develop reference values. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine the reliability in females and to establish the preliminary reference values for the TFBS. Methods: Twenty-three healthy female participants for reliability and 44 (7 male and 37 female) participants for preliminary reference values participated in this cross-sectional study. For both aspects of the study, participants were instructed to breathe at their own pace with no specific instruction. Then each participant was observed carrying out normal breathing for a period of 10 breaths and deep breathing for a period of 10 breaths while being assessed with the TFBS. Results: Intrarater and interrater reliability of the TFBS showed a kappa value of 0.769 and 0.751, respectively, indicating substantial agreement for female participants. The preliminary reference categories for TFBS were reported to be normal for 20 (45.5%) participants and mild faulty breathing for the remaining 24 (54.4%) participants. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggested that TFBS was reliable to measure breathing function among female participants, and the reference categories may be helpful in the identification of normal and faulty breathing.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleReliability and preliminary reference values for the Total Faulty Breathing Scale (TFBS): A cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleHealth Science Reportsen_US
article.volume5en_US
article.stream.affiliationsBournemouth Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsHealthy Ageing Physiotherapy and Research Centreen_US
article.stream.affiliationsWellness Springsen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.