Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75789
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGo Satoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJirawat Saengsinen_US
dc.contributor.authorPongpanot Sornsakrinen_US
dc.contributor.authorRohan Bhimanien_US
dc.contributor.authorBart Lubbertsen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkira Taniguchien_US
dc.contributor.authorChristopher DiGiovannien_US
dc.contributor.authorYasuhito Tanakaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:02:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:02:42Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1554527Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn07360266en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85120991716en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1002/jor.25237en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120991716&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75789-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to characterize ankle stability of total talar prosthesis (TTP) and to determine the effect of implant sizes on stability as well as the resistance to TTP dislocation. Twelve below-knee cadaveric specimens were divided into two groups. Group 1 received a size matched implant and Group 2 received downsized implant by 5%. The stability assessment under fluoroscopy was performed for each cadaver in its native state. Following TTP insertion process, each then underwent evaluation of the TTP ankle stability. The stability of pre- and post-TTP was compared. (1) Anterior drawer distance. (2) Talar tilt angle under varus and valgus stress. (3) Subtalar tilt angle under varus stress was measured. Finally, the dislocation test was performed using the aforementioned testing conditions, then the stress force was slowly increased from 0 to 350 N, during which time it was observed on fluoroscopy all the time. Compared to pre TTP ankles, varus and anterior drawer stress showed significant instability (p < 0.001–0.031). Only anterior drawer stress in smaller sized implants showed significant instability when compared to identical sized implants (p = 0.008). No dislocation was seen under varus, valgus, and subtalar stress. However, anterior dislocation was observed in all cases of smaller size implant group (p = 0.045). TTP implant was stable under valgus and subtalar stress. However, clinicians should pay attention to anterior instability. Notably, downsized implants should be considered carefully to minimize the chance of anterior dislocation.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe stability of total talar prosthesis—How stable to dislocation? Cadaveric studyen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Orthopaedic Researchen_US
article.volume40en_US
article.stream.affiliationsMassachusetts General Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNara Medical Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsAsahikawa Medical Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsHarvard Medical Schoolen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSomdech Phra Pinklao Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.