Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75679
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWorapaka Manosroien_US
dc.contributor.authorPitchaporn Phudphongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPichitchai Atthakomolen_US
dc.contributor.authorMattabhorn Phimphilaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T07:01:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T07:01:51Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14726823en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85137026833en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1186/s12902-022-01135-yen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85137026833&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75679-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The data on lipid profile differences between primary aldosteronism (PA) and essential hypertension (EH) patients are inconsistent and inconclusive. Most studies reported lower levels of lipid profiles in PA than in EH. This meta-analysis aimed to explore differences in serum lipid profiles including triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), LDL and HDL levels in PA patients and EH patients. Methods: A search of published studies was performed using PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases from their inception through August 2022. Thirty studies involving 11,175 patients were identified. Inclusion criteria included 1) observational studies which contained data on any of the lipid profiles of interest (TG, TC, LDL and HDL) which could be acquired from baseline data or the outcomes, 2) data which should be compared between adult PA and EH patients and 3) the use of appropriate methods to diagnose PA. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to assess effect size by using STATA program version 15.0. Risk of bias was assessed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools for cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies. Results: Levels of the lipid parameters TG (SMD − 0.16 mmol/L; 95%CI (− 0.25, − 0.07)), TC (SMD − 0.30 mmol/L; 95%CI (− 0.41, − 0.19)) and LDL (SMD − 0.17 mmol/L; 95%CI (− 0.27, − 0.08)) were significantly lower in PA than in EH patients. There was no statistically significant difference in HDL between PA and EH patients (SMD − 0.08 mmol/L; 96%CI (− 0.23,0.07)). High levels of heterogeneity for TG, TC, HDL and LDL were observed in all studies. Risk of bias among the studies was low to moderate. Conclusion: Lower levels of TG, TC and LDL were observed in PA than in EH patients. Further study should be conducted to address the underlying mechanisms of lipid alteration in PA.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe differences of serum lipid profiles between primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension: a meta-analysis and systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleBMC Endocrine Disordersen_US
article.volume22en_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.