Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75428
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMalinee Khumsupaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T06:59:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T06:59:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-23en_US
dc.identifier.issn26300303en_US
dc.identifier.issn08595747en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85121817173en_US
dc.identifier.other10.14456/tureview.2021.18en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121817173&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75428-
dc.description.abstractThe public sphere in Thailand during 2006-2016 has limited and restricted freedom of expression under the authoritarian military regime. Many laws and promulgations were issued to enforce security. Military authorities extended their powers to excessively restrict rights and silence dissent in the name of security. Several laws actively proposed and enacted for decade such as Criminal Law Code section 112 or lese-majesty law, Internal Security Act (2008), Computer-related Crime Act (2007), Film and Video Act (2008),and Article 44 of the Interim Constitution 2007. This paper examines short film screenings during the Thai Short Film and Video Festival. These films criticized political issues based on rational-critical dialogues and inserted political messages aesthetically through rhetoric, metaphors, and satires. This paper found that these short films can be categorized into types, all of which utilize political symbols for representations i.e. idealized utopian or idealist ideas, inequality bias, relationship decline, symbolized conflicts, and resistance. Three types of amateur films were also selected to represent different political topics at different times. These films appeared in different genres such as short film, documentary film, and experimental film. The paper recommends public space in term of film screening or film festival is necessary for the young generation at the present because they can use it as counter public to debate and discuss a political issue with critical and rational thought instead of rally on the street.en_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleThe lens of micro counter-public in authoritarian thailand 2006-2016en_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleThammasat Reviewen_US
article.volume24en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.