Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75231
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMalaiporn Wongkaewen_US
dc.contributor.authorSila Kittiwachanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNutthatida Phuangsaijaien_US
dc.contributor.authorBow Tinpovongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChantalak Tiyayonen_US
dc.contributor.authorTonapha Pusadeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorBajaree Chuttongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKorawan Sringarmen_US
dc.contributor.authorFarhan M. Bhaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSarana Rose Sommanoen_US
dc.contributor.authorRatchadawan Cheewangkoonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T06:57:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T06:57:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn22237747en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85107222553en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/plants10061148en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107222553&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/75231-
dc.description.abstractMango peel, a byproduct from the mango processing industry, is a potential source of food-rade mango peel pectin (MPP). Nonetheless, the influence of fruit physical characteristics and phytochemicals of peels on their correspondent pectin level has never been examined, particularly when high‐quality food additives are of commercial need. Subsequently, the ultimate aim of the present study was to comprehend their relationship using chemometric data analyses as part of raw material sourcing criteria. Principal component analysis (PCA) advised that mangoes of ‘maha-chanok’ and ‘nam dok mai’ could be distinguished from ‘chok anan’ and ‘kaew’ on the basis of physiology, peel morphology, and phytochemical characteristics. Only pectin extracted from mango var. ‘chok anan’ was classified as low‐methoxyl type (Mox value ~4%). Using the partial least‐squares (PLS) regression, the multivariate correlation between the fruit and peel properties and the degree of esterification (DE) value was reported at R2 > 0.9 and Q2 > 0.8. The coefficient factors illustrated that yields of byproducts such as seed and total biomass negatively influenced DE values, while they were positively correlated with crude fiber and xylose contents of the peels. Overall, it is interesting to highlight that, regardless of the differences in fruit varieties, the amount of biomass and peel proximate properties can be proficiently applied to establish classification of desirable properties of the industrial MPP.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleFruit characteristics, peel nutritional compositions, and their relationships with mango peel pectin qualityen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitlePlantsen_US
article.volume10en_US
article.stream.affiliationsRajamangala University of Technology Lannaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technologyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.