Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74603
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Patrick Dallasega | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Manuel Woschank | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Joseph Sarkis | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Korrakot Yaibuathet Tippayawong | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-16T06:45:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-16T06:45:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-16 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 02635577 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85131527757 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1108/IMDS-11-2021-0694 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131527757&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74603 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This study aims to provide a measurement model, and the underlying constructs and items, for Logistics 4.0 in manufacturing companies. Industry 4.0 technology for logistics processes has been termed Logistics 4.0. Logistics 4.0 and its elements have seen varied conceptualizations in the literature. The literature has mainly focused on conceptual and theoretical studies, which supports the notion that Logistics 4.0 is a relatively young area of research. Refinement of constructs and building consensus perspectives and definitions is necessary for practical and theoretical advances in this area. Design/methodology/approach: Based on a detailed literature review and practitioner focus group interviews, items of Logistics 4.0 for manufacturing enterprises were further validated by using a large-scale survey with practicing experts from organizations located in Central Europe, the Northeastern United States of America and Northern Thailand. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to define a measurement model for Logistics 4.0. Findings: Based on 239 responses the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses resulted in nine items and three factors for the final Logistics 4.0 measurement model. It combines “the leveraging of increased organizational capabilities” (factor 1) with “the rise of interconnection and material flow transparency” (factor 2) and “the setting up of autonomization in logistics processes” (factor 3). Practical implications: Practitioners can use the proposed measurement model to assess their current level of maturity regarding the implementation of Logistics 4.0 practices. They can map the current state and derive appropriate implementation plans as well as benchmark against best practices across or between industries based on these metrics. Originality/value: Logistics 4.0 is a relatively young research area, which necessitates greater development through empirical validation. To the best of the authors knowledge, an empirically validated multidimensional construct to measure Logistics 4.0 in manufacturing companies does not exist. | en_US |
dc.subject | Business, Management and Accounting | en_US |
dc.subject | Computer Science | en_US |
dc.subject | Engineering | en_US |
dc.title | Logistics 4.0 measurement model: empirical validation based on an international survey | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Industrial Management and Data Systems | en_US |
article.volume | 122 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | The Business School | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Montanuniversitat Leoben | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Free University of Bozen-Bolzano | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Hanken School of Economics | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.