Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74534
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nuchjira Takheaw | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chalerm Liwsrisakun | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Warawut Chaiwong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Witida Laopajon | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Supansa Pata | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Juthamas Inchai | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pilaiporn Duangjit | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chaicharn Pothirat | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chaiwat Bumroongkit | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Athavudh Deesomchok | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Theerakorn Theerakittikul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Atikun Limsukon | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pattraporn Tajarernmuang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nutchanok Niyatiwatchanchai | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Konlawij Trongtrakul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Watchara Kasinrerk | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-16T06:43:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-16T06:43:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-06-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 20754418 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85131369643 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.3390/diagnostics12061315 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85131369643&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74534 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Various vaccines have been developed to control the COVID-19 pandemic, but the available vaccines were developed using ancestral SARS-CoV-2 wild-type (WT) strains. Commercial antiSARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody assays have been established and employed for validation of vaccine efficacy. However, these assays were developed before the SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) emerged. It is unclear whether anti-RBD IgG levels can predict immunity against VOCs. In this study, we determined the correlations between the levels of anti-RBD IgG and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated subjects. After vaccination, 100% of subjects showed an anti-RBD IgG response, whereas 82, 79, 30, 75, and 2% showed NAb responses against WT, Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, respectively. A high correlation was observed between anti-RBD IgG and NAbs against WT, Alpha, Beta, and Delta, but not so for the Omicron NAbs. Among subjects with high levels of anti-RBD IgG, 93, 93, 71, 93, and 0% of them had NAbs against WT, Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, respectively. These results indicate that anti-RBD IgG levels cannot be used as a predictor for the presence of NAbs against the globally dominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. | en_US |
dc.subject | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | en_US |
dc.title | Correlation Analysis of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG and Neutralizing Antibody against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants after Vaccination | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Diagnostics | en_US |
article.volume | 12 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.