Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74345
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEinar Ringøen_US
dc.contributor.authorXuemei Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorHien van Doanen_US
dc.contributor.authorKoushik Ghoshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-16T06:40:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-16T06:40:15Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-02en_US
dc.identifier.issn22967745en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85132802900en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3389/fmars.2022.848037en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132802900&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/74345-
dc.description.abstractGrowing demands stimulate the intensification of production and create the need for practices that are both economically viable and environmentally sustainable. As European Union banned the use of antibiotics in production in 2003, several alternative treatments have been suggested, including probiotics. The first probiotic study in aquaculture was published in 1986, and since then probiotics have been considered as a beneficial tool in this industry. Today current evidence suggests that administration of certain probiotic strains might be able to enhance growth rate, improve the welfare of different fish species by modulating gut microbiota, improve physiological functions, such as metabolism, digestion, immunity, stress tolerance, intestinal histology, and disease resistance. Even though lactic acid bacteria and Bacillus spp. are the most frequently used probiotics in aquaculture, numerous studies have been published on other interesting probiotics. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to summarize, comment, and discuss the current knowledge related to the effects of Aeromonas, Aliivibrio, Alteromonas, Arthrobacter, Bifidobacterium, Brochothrix, Clostridium, Enterovibrio, Kocuria, Microbacterium, Micrococcus, Paenibacillus, Phaeobacter, Pseudoalteromonas, Pseudomonas, Rhodococcus, Rhodopseudomonas, Rhodosporidium, Roseobacter, Shewanella and Vibrio as probiotics in finfish aquaculture, and present general information on their presence in the gastrointestinal tract of finfish. Moreover, some considerations for future studies are also indicated.en_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEarth and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleInteresting Probiotic Bacteria Other Than the More Widely Used Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacilli in Finfishen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleFrontiers in Marine Scienceen_US
article.volume9en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChinese Academy of Fishery Sciencesen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThe University of Burdwanen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUiT Norges Arktiske Universiteten_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.