Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73254
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSurapon Nochaiwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorMati Chuamanochanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChidchanok Ruengornen_US
dc.contributor.authorRatanaporn Awiphanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNapatra Tovanabutraen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiri Chiewchanviten_US
dc.contributor.authorBrian Huttonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKednapa Thavornen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:37:33Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:37:33Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn22132198en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85120176420en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.022en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120176420&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73254-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Recently, pharmacological treatment options for H1-antihistamine–refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria have increased dramatically; however, their effects on patient-reported outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), remain unclear. Objective: To compare the impact of these treatments on HRQOL among H1-antihistamine–refractory patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. Methods: We completed a comprehensive search of the available literature in the electronic databases, gray literature, and preprint reports up to April 19, 2021, with no language restrictions. The primary outcome for evaluation was a change in HRQOL from the baseline, and secondary outcomes included patient unacceptability and other patient-reported outcomes. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis and estimated differences in standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios with 95% CIs. Evidence-based synthesis was based on magnitudes of effect size, evidence certainty, ranking of treatment effects, and clinically meaningful improvement. Results: Twelve randomized controlled trials encompassing 1866 adolescent and adult patients were included. Our evidence synthesis analyses revealed that hydroxychloroquine (SMD, −1.00 [−1.61 to −0.39]), 72 mg ligelizumab (SMD, −0.66 [−0.96 to −0.35]), 240 mg ligelizumab (SMD, −0.67 [−0.98 to −0.37]), and 300 mg omalizumab (SMD, −0.53 [−0.67 to −0.39]) significantly improved HRQOL with a moderate beneficial effect. However, the use of hydroxychloroquine seems to be limited by a higher risk of patient unacceptability of treatment. Other secondary outcomes remain inconclusive based on the available evidence. Conclusions: Both ligelizumab (72 or 240 mg) and 300 mg omalizumab appeared to be effective treatments for H1-antihistamine–refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria, because they were closely associated with improved HRQOL.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleImpact of Pharmacological Treatments for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria with an Inadequate Response to H1-Antihistamines on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practiceen_US
article.volume10en_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Ottawaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversité d'Ottawa, Faculté de Médecineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsOttawa Hospital Research Instituteen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.