Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73115
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDerin Sevenleren_US
dc.contributor.authorXin Niuen_US
dc.contributor.authorSandy Dossantosen_US
dc.contributor.authorMehmet Toneren_US
dc.contributor.authorTim R. Cresseyen_US
dc.contributor.authorRebecca D. Sandlinen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul K. Drainen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:35:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:35:46Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14602091en_US
dc.identifier.issn03057453en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85128159707en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1093/jac/dkab487en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128159707&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/73115-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Objective measurement of antiretrovirals may aid clinical interventions for improving adherence to HIV prevention or treatment regimens. A point-of-care urine test could provide real-time information about recent adherence to regimens containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide. We developed a lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) and ELISA for urinary tenofovir. Methods: The intensity of the LFA test line was quantified using an optical reader and visually scored 0-5 by two independent people, using a reference card. The sensitivity and specificity of both the ELISA and LFA were determined for two different tenofovir concentration cut-offs for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide adherence - 1500 and 150 ng/mL, respectively. To validate the assays, we measured 586 urine samples from 28 individuals collected as part of a study of tenofovir pharmacokinetics in adults, which were also measured by MS for reference. Results: Both the LFA signal and ELISA signal were each strongly correlated with drug concentrations (0.91 and 0.92, respectively). The LFA signal and ELISA were highly sensitive and specific at both thresholds (LFA sensitivity/specificity: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 89%/96%; and tenofovir alafenamide, 90%/96%) (ELISA sensitivity/specificity: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 94%/94%; and tenofovir alafenamide, 92%/84%). Visual scoring of the LFA was also highly sensitive and specific at both the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate threshold and the tenofovir alafenamide threshold (sensitivity/specificity: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, 91%/94%; and tenofovir alafenamide, 87%/90%). Conclusions: Our rapid semi-quantitative test can measure tenofovir concentrations relevant to both tenofovir alafenamide and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate adherence, which may support adherence-promoting interventions across a range of HIV care settings.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceuticsen_US
dc.titlePoint-of-care semi-quantitative test for adherence to tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarateen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapyen_US
article.volume77en_US
article.stream.affiliationsMassachusetts General Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Liverpoolen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Washingtonen_US
article.stream.affiliationsHarvard Medical Schoolen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.