Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72945
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDaniel Goodwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorIan Holmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiwa Pardthaisongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupattra Visessrien_US
dc.contributor.authorChaiwat Ekkawatpaniten_US
dc.contributor.authorDolores Rey Vicarioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:32:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:32:26Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1436378Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn14363798en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85123083441en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10113-021-01867-yen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85123083441&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72945-
dc.description.abstractAgriculture is sensitive to drought and associated social, environmental and economic impacts. Finance-based interventions aim to support farmers affected by drought; however, the extent to which such tools encourage resilience to this natural hazard is unclear. This paper systematically reviews evidence on links between financial interventions to mitigate drought-related impacts and adaptation towards longer-term resilience. We focus on tropical Asia where agriculture contributes significantly to national economies and is a primary source of livelihood in a region subject to high climate variability and episodic drought. Guided by Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcome criteria, we identify and review 43 regionally specific articles that describe a range of financial interventions. Through thematic synthesis, we document the interventions’ associations with micro-level and macro-level outcomes. The results reveal how some interventions helped sustain household incomes and crop yield (e.g. through farm investments that increased productivity) through drought, whilst others encouraged adaptive behaviours. At a macro-level, there were challenges associated with government budgets and scheme administration, with the longevity of many schemes difficult to sustain. From fragmented evidence, this review reasons that there can be challenging policy trade-offs for institutions between supporting livelihoods and economic growth whilst also protecting the environment—highlighting the interdependence of systems’ resilience and variability in actors’ capacity to adapt. Low-regret interventions that integrate existing community adaptive practices, engage with farmers’ needs and prioritise extension support may encourage more desirable counteractions to drought; however, further research is needed to establish the role of such interventions.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleWhat is the evidence linking financial assistance for drought-affected agriculture and resilience in tropical Asia? A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleRegional Environmental Changeen_US
article.volume22en_US
article.stream.affiliationsKing Mongkuts University of Technologyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChulalongkorn Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCranfield Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.