Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72836
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYi Peng Xuen_US
dc.contributor.authorRun Hao Liuen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeng Zhuo Shenen_US
dc.contributor.authorZheng Ang Lven_US
dc.contributor.authorSupat Chupraditen_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmed Sayed M. Metwallyen_US
dc.contributor.authorMika Sillanpaaen_US
dc.contributor.authorQian Qianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-27T08:30:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-27T08:30:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn23525509en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85129961890en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129961890&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/72836-
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to develop an economically viable novel process with high thermodynamic efficiency for the co-generation of methanol and electricity from coke oven gas (COG) and blast furnace gas (BFG). For this purpose, two processes are proposed to utilize COG and BFG. In process A, syngas is obtained from COG reforming, and BFG, after providing the required heat for the reformer, is injected into the methanol synthesis reactor as a rich carbon source. In process B, in addition to the above-mentioned, additional hydrogen is injected into the methanol reactor to enhance carbon dioxide conversion. The performance of the proposed systems is evaluated using energy efficiency, exergy efficiency, net CO2 emission, and total production cost. Results show that energy efficiencies for processes A and B are 53.53% and 72.8%, and their exergy efficiencies are 23% and 26%, respectively. Moreover, environmental analysis demonstrates that process B has a net CO2 emission of −1.82 kgCO2/kgmethanol, while for process A, this parameter is relatively higher, and it is positive. From the economic viewpoint, it is concluded that process B is more feasible, and the total production cost of methanol decreases by 87.62% compared to process A. Also, it can be deduced that in the case of utilizing additional hydrogen electricity and methanol production from COG and BFG is interesting from the thermodynamic and economic point of view, and due to negative net CO2 emission, it is environmentally desirable, too.en_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleAssessment of methanol and electricity co-production plants based on coke oven gas and blast furnace gas utilizationen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleSustainable Production and Consumptionen_US
article.volume32en_US
article.stream.affiliationsTiangong Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsInner Mongolia University of Science and Technologyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNanjing Audit Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsAarhus Universiteten_US
article.stream.affiliationsKunming University of Science and Technologyen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCentral South Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCollege of Sciencesen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Johannesburgen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.