Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71937
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohammed Saadawien_US
dc.contributor.authorSebastián Layeraen_US
dc.contributor.authorJulián Alisteen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaniela Bravoen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrangmalee Leurcharusmeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Q. Tranen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T04:18:16Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-27T04:18:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18734529en_US
dc.identifier.issn09528180en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85092016314en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110063en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092016314&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71937-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Elsevier Inc. Study objective: This narrative review discusses the anatomy, mechanism of action, techniques, pharmacology, indications, complications and substitutes for erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks. Interventions: The Medline, Embase and Google Scholar databases (inception-last week of April 2020) were searched. For indications and alternative blocks, a systematic analysis of the available evidence was carried out. In order to highlight the best evidence available, only randomized trials with prospective registration, blinded assessment and sample size justification were retained for analysis. Main results: The collective body of anatomical studies suggests that ESP block may work through a combination of different mechanisms (e.g., local anesthetic spread to the thoracic paravertebral space, epidural space, and dorsal ramus). Compared to control, the available evidence suggests that ESP block results in decreased postoperative pain and opioid requirement for a wide array of thoracic and abdominal surgical interventions. Erector spinae plane blocks and thoracic paravertebral blocks seem to provide comparable benefits for thoracoscopic and breast cancer surgery when performed with a similar number of injections. Currently, ESP blocks should be favored over intercostal blocks since, at best, the latter provide similar analgesia to ESP blocks despite requiring multiple-level injections. Conclusions: In recent years, ESP blocks have become the topic of considerable clinical interest. Future trials are required to investigate their optimal technique, dose of local anesthetic and perineural adjuvants. Moreover, additional investigation should compare ESP blocks with robust multimodal analgesic regimens as well as truncal blocks such as thoracic epidural block, midpoint transverse process to pleura block, PECS block, quadratus lumborum block, and transversus abdominis plane block.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleErector spinae plane block: A narrative review with systematic analysis of the evidence pertaining to clinical indications and alternative truncal blocksen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Clinical Anesthesiaen_US
article.volume68en_US
article.stream.affiliationsHospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chileen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversité McGillen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.