Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71521
Title: Scale-related governance challenges in the water–energy–food nexus: toward a diagnostic approach
Authors: Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Philipp Gorris
Nicolas Jager
Larissa Koch
Louis Lebel
Christian Stein
Sandra Venghaus
Sisira Withanachchi
Authors: Claudia Pahl-Wostl
Philipp Gorris
Nicolas Jager
Larissa Koch
Louis Lebel
Christian Stein
Sandra Venghaus
Sisira Withanachchi
Keywords: Environmental Science;Social Sciences
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2020
Abstract: © 2020, The Author(s). The notion of a water–energy–food (WEF) nexus was introduced to encourage a more holistic perspective on the sustainable development of natural resources. Most attention has been directed at identifying potential synergies and trade-offs among sectors that could be addressed with improved technologies and management. The governance of the WEF nexus more broadly has received comparatively little attention, and the importance of scale in space and time has been largely ignored. Inspired by scholarship on multi-level governance in individual sectors, this paper identifies four scale-related governance challenges in the WEF nexus, namely: (1) scalar fit, which arises when planning and operating procedures work at different levels along the scales of space and time in different sectors; (2) scalar strategies, wherever the levels at which actors have influence and in which action takes place are contested and negotiated; (3) institutional interplay, where rules and norms in different sectors influence each other at different levels; (4) scalar uncertainty, arising out of the complexity of multi-level and multi-scale interactions. The relevance of these four challenges is illustrated with case studies from developed and developing countries. These examples show the importance of considering multiple levels and scales when assessing the likely effectiveness of WEF nexus governance mechanisms or proposals. The cases underline the need to pay close attention to issues of power, contestation, and negotiation, in addition to the analysis of institutional design. Thus, this paper recommends that nexus governance efforts and proposals be scrutinized for scale assumptions. The four identified challenges offer a suitable starting point for diagnosis.
URI: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097754894&origin=inward
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71521
ISSN: 18624057
18624065
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.