Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71095
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Evelyne Micollier | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-27T03:33:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-27T03:33:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | ASR: Chiang Mai University.Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 2, 2 (Jul-Dec 2015), p. 91-101 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2465-4329 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://cmuj.cmu.ac.th/uploads/asr_journal_list_index/719531104.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71095 | - |
dc.description | ASR (Asian Social Research) was first launched in 2014 by Chiang Mai University. However, it has a longer history, with its genesis in 2002 as part of Chiang Mai University Journal.This journal was split into two in 2007, with the formation of ASR's predecessor, the Chiang Mai University Journal of social Sciences and Humanities, which was later restyled as ASR in 2014, and began publishing online in 2015. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Framing ‘new ethics’ within both Chinese and international characteristics has become a pressing issue, while China’s research and innovation policy encourages a turn towards a knowledge economy and a number of international/Chinese corporates delocalize industrial production to poorer countries offering cheaper labor. Plural health ideas, practices, and medical sciences are developing within the broader framework of the social and economic transformation of the Chinese society. Voices from civil society wish also to participate in the debates going on in the official, academic, and media spheres. On one side, ethno-(medical) ethics may be contested by most international development actors who strongly support a universalistic view of ethics; on the other side, local/national knowledge through the voices of a number of lay people’s groups, locally-based and trained experts, and official actors seek ground for recognition. Of course, positions taken by all these stakeholders in terms of knowledge production, decision-making, and policy implementation may diverge widely. This paper will unveil a number of issues discussed in the 2000s relative to medical ethics, bioethics, and the New Health Reform guidelines and implementation. Finally, this paper will approach ‘localized’ biomedicine as contested knowledge through a few examples. My study is based on data collected using anthropological methodology and archival research. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | Eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chiang Mai University | en_US |
dc.subject | Ethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Knowledge | en_US |
dc.subject | Localization | en_US |
dc.subject | Globalization | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject | Anthropology | en_US |
dc.subject | China | en_US |
dc.title | Medical Ethics and Therapeutic Knowledge from China as Contested Knowledge in Times of Globalization | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.