Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71095
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEvelyne Micollieren_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-27T03:33:00Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-27T03:33:00Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationASR: Chiang Mai University.Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 2, 2 (Jul-Dec 2015), p. 91-101en_US
dc.identifier.issn2465-4329en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://cmuj.cmu.ac.th/uploads/asr_journal_list_index/719531104.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/71095-
dc.descriptionASR (Asian Social Research) was first launched in 2014 by Chiang Mai University. However, it has a longer history, with its genesis in 2002 as part of Chiang Mai University Journal.This journal was split into two in 2007, with the formation of ASR's predecessor, the Chiang Mai University Journal of social Sciences and Humanities, which was later restyled as ASR in 2014, and began publishing online in 2015.en_US
dc.description.abstractFraming ‘new ethics’ within both Chinese and international characteristics has become a pressing issue, while China’s research and innovation policy encourages a turn towards a knowledge economy and a number of international/Chinese corporates delocalize industrial production to poorer countries offering cheaper labor. Plural health ideas, practices, and medical sciences are developing within the broader framework of the social and economic transformation of the Chinese society. Voices from civil society wish also to participate in the debates going on in the official, academic, and media spheres. On one side, ethno-(medical) ethics may be contested by most international development actors who strongly support a universalistic view of ethics; on the other side, local/national knowledge through the voices of a number of lay people’s groups, locally-based and trained experts, and official actors seek ground for recognition. Of course, positions taken by all these stakeholders in terms of knowledge production, decision-making, and policy implementation may diverge widely. This paper will unveil a number of issues discussed in the 2000s relative to medical ethics, bioethics, and the New Health Reform guidelines and implementation. Finally, this paper will approach ‘localized’ biomedicine as contested knowledge through a few examples. My study is based on data collected using anthropological methodology and archival research.en_US
dc.language.isoEngen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chiang Mai Universityen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectLocalizationen_US
dc.subjectGlobalizationen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectAnthropologyen_US
dc.subjectChinaen_US
dc.titleMedical Ethics and Therapeutic Knowledge from China as Contested Knowledge in Times of Globalizationen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.