Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70965
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChitrada Thongdeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhichayut Phinyoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJayanton Patumanonden_US
dc.contributor.authorBancha Satirapojen_US
dc.contributor.authorNantana Spillesen_US
dc.contributor.authorBoonruksa Laonapapornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPichaya Tantiyavarongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdis Tasanarongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T08:45:41Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T08:45:41Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn17556686en_US
dc.identifier.issn17556678en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85088805626en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1111/jorc.12340en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088805626&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70965-
dc.description.abstract© 2020 European Dialysis and Transplant Nurses Association/European Renal Care Association Background: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) is one of the most critical adverse events during maintenance haemodialysis. Previous studies reported the association of fluid removal rate with the occurrence of IDH. Objective: We aimed to identify the optimal threshold of ultrafiltration rate to prevent the occurrence of IDH events. Design, Participants and Measurements: Prognostic factor research with a retrospective case–control design was conducted. Patient data were gathered from four haemodialysis units from January to December 2017. All the haemodialysis records were independently justified, whether IDH occurred or not, based on the standard definition. A total of 10 haemodialysis sessions were sampled from each patient's pool based on the incidence of events. The association of ultrafiltration rates and IDH events was explored by multivariable multilevel logistic regression. Results: A total of 1080 haemodialysis sessions from 108 patients were included: 149 (13.8%) with IDH and 931 (86.2%) without IDH. After adjusting for all pre-specified risk factors and imbalance baselines, the odds ratio of IDH were 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 2.52) for rate 10–12 ml/kg/h; 2.52 (95% CI: 1.20, 5.29) for rate 12–14 ml/kg/h; 4.02 (95% CI: 1.61, 10.03) for rate 14–16 ml/kg/h; and 7.41 (95% CI: 2.53, 21.68) for rate >16 ml/kg/h comparing to the referent rate of <10 ml/kg/h. Conclusion: The ultrafiltration rate should be limited to 12 ml/kg/h. If a higher rate of fluid removal was indicated, it should not exceed 16 ml/kg/h to avoid the occurrence of IDH.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleUltrafiltration rates and intradialytic hypotension: A case–control sampling of pooled haemodialysis dataen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Renal Careen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThammasat Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsPhramongkutklao College of Medicineen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNopparat Rajathanee Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.