Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70816
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | S. Pitakkarnkul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | S. Chanpanitkitchot | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | J. Srisomboon | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | S. Tangjitgamol | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-14T08:41:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-14T08:41:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-07-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 01252208 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-85089831440 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089831440&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70816 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © Journal of The Medical Association of Thailand Objective: To determine the methods that Thai gynecologic oncologists used to assess the operability and neoadjuvant treatment in apparently advanced endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: This study was a part of the national survey project by the Thai Gynecologic Cancer Society on the management of gynecologic cancer in Thailand. All Thai gynecologic oncologists who had been in practice for at least 1 year were invited to respond about their practice to the online questionnaire open from August to October, 2019. Data on the methods to assess the operability of advanced endometrial cancer and the type of neoadjuvant treatment before surgery were abstracted from the database and analyzed. Results: Among 170 respondents, 48.8% performed physical examination along with imaging study to assess the operability whereas 25.9% relied only on an imaging study. The most common imaging study was a computed tomography scan (84.1%). The respondents who worked in training hospitals used special imaging studies (aside from ultrasonography) significantly more frequently than those in service-only hospitals, 95.3% vs. 84.5% (p = 0.022). Regarding the neoadjuvant therapy before surgery, chemotherapy (58.7%), chemotherapy combined with radiation (41.9%), and radiation therapy alone (33.5%) were selected as modes of treatment. Radiation therapy was selected as an option more frequently among the respondents working in government and in training hospitals compared to private and service-only hospitals: 36.2% vs. 5.6% (p = 0.009) and 40.7% vs. 25.0% (p = 0.022), respectively. Combined radiation and chemotherapy were more frequently selected among the respondents who had been in practice >5 years (48.5%) vs. <5 years (31.0%), p = 0.022. Conclusion: An assessment of operability and neoadjuvant therapy before surgery in advanced endometrial cancer among the Thai gynecologic oncologists varied. These were influenced by the hospital's features and experience of the respondents. | en_US |
dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
dc.title | Pre-operative assessment and neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgery for advanced endometrial cancer: Survey of practice among Thai gynecologic oncologists | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand | en_US |
article.volume | 103 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | National Cancer Institute Thailand | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Rangsit University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Vajira Hospital | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.