Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70504
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJoyeeta Guptaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLouis Lebelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T08:32:08Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T08:32:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn15731553en_US
dc.identifier.issn15679764en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85085497408en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10784-020-09486-4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85085497408&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/70504-
dc.description.abstract© 2020, The Author(s). Researching socio-ecological justice issues in earth system governance can be operationalized through an Access (securing minimum needs) and Allocation (allocating the remaining resources, responsibilities and risks) framework. This paper synthesizes the review articles in this special issue. It concludes that (a) although international trade, investment and aid aim to enhance access, efficiently allocate resources and reduce risk, in practice the volume of trade and investment, the geographical distance between production and consumption, the pursuit of competitiveness and use of market instruments have concentrated wealth at great cost to socio-ecological justice; (b) research on food, water, energy, climate change and biodiversity reveal multiple linkages among the sustainable development goals, underlining the limitations of sectoral and incremental approaches to socio-ecological justice, for example, for smallholders; (c) while access issues are becoming difficult for politicians to ignore, allocation issues are being side-stepped because they draw too much attention to the underlying causes of inequality and poverty, (d) corrective justice is not enough, substantive justice approaches are needed emphasizing a rights-based framework and allocation cannot be exclusively left to market forces and mechanisms when it concerns public and merit goods; and (e) the terms access and allocation, although individually used, are not popular as a paired framework in the socio-ecological justice literature, but remain highly salient and cover the key justice issues for improving earth system governance.en_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleAccess and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goalsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economicsen_US
article.volume20en_US
article.stream.affiliationsIHE Delft Institute for Water Educationen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversiteit van Amsterdamen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.