Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68631
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Siwaporn Fongthong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Komsan Suriya | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-20T04:41:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-20T04:41:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | ASR: Chiang Mai University.Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 1,1 (Jan-Dec 2014), p.21-37 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2465-4329 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuj.cmu.ac.th/uploads/asr_journal_list_index/448869878.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/68631 | - |
dc.description | ASR (Asian Social Research) was first launched in 2014 by Chiang Mai University. However, it has a longer history, with its genesis in 2002 as part of Chiang Mai University Journal.This journal was split into two in 2007, with the formation of ASR's predecessor, the Chiang Mai University Journal of social Sciences and Humanities, which was later restyled as ASR in 2014, and began publishing online in 2015. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | To help alleviate poverty, Thailand created the Village and Urban Community Fund (Village Fund). To determine whether the Village Fund has been able to reach the truly poor, this paper applies a Logit model, using data from Thailand’s Socioeconomic Survey at the household level in 2009, to investigate the determinants of borrowers and whether being poor is significant for borrowing from the Fund. Our analysis reveals that The Village Fund targets near-poor and moderate-income households, not the poor. The Village Fund cannot be said to be pro-poor. However, the program has its merits, particularly in lending to women and less-educated heads of households. For near-poor households, the most likely borrowers are farmers, especially landless farmers in rural areas with income slightly above the poverty line. For moderate-income households, the most likely borrowers also have access to other sources of credit. While not directly pro-poor, the Village Fund, in lending to near and moderate-income groups, helps them avoid falling into poverty. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | Eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chiang Mai University | en_US |
dc.subject | Microcredit | en_US |
dc.subject | Village fund | en_US |
dc.subject | Urban community fund | en_US |
dc.subject | Rural development | en_US |
dc.subject | Poverty reduction | en_US |
dc.title | Determinants of Borrowers of the Village and Urban Community Fund in Thailand | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.