Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66665
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAnawat Thippraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorChinnapat Buacharten_US
dc.contributor.authorChayanon Hansapinyoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuchart Limkatanyuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-16T12:52:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-16T12:52:33Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn16797825en_US
dc.identifier.issn16797817en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85071289462en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1590/1679-78255510en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071289462&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/66665-
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Brazilian Association of Computational Mechanics. All rights reserved. This paper presents cyclic load test of five exterior reinforced concrete frames. All the specimens represent a substandard single-span, low-rise reinforced concrete frame building which behaves a weak column-strong beam mechanism under a strong seismic loading. The first three exterior frames M1, M2 and M3 were designed for the joint shear critical to investigate the effect of joint reinforcement. They are similar except the joint reinforcement detailing. The fourth specimen M4 was an exterior frame with a very small column member. The fifth specimen U5 was the seismic upgrade of M4 specimen using externally attached steel column. From the first three tests, the increase in shear capacity due to the reinforcement provided in the beam-column joint was negligible when the column size was small leading to high joint shear stress. The shear capacity of the specimens was agreed well with the calculation formula provided by ACI318 (ACI, 2008) ignoring the contribution from the reinforcement. The upgraded frame markedly indicated the increased capacity of 2.02 times of the strength of M4 specimen. However, the ductility of the upgraded frame was decreased. It was the result from that the failure mode of the specimen was shifted from the joint failure to the column damage at the section next to the end of the attached steel column.en_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectMaterials Scienceen_US
dc.titleSeismic upgrading of exterior reinforced concrete frame with small column and joint area using externally attached steel columnen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleLatin American Journal of Solids and Structuresen_US
article.volume16en_US
article.stream.affiliationsPrince of Songkla Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.