Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63710
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDumnoensun Pruksakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorJatupon Kongthavonskulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPimpisa Teeyakasemen_US
dc.contributor.authorAreerak Phanphaisarnen_US
dc.contributor.authorParunya Chaiyawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorJeerawan Klangjorhoren_US
dc.contributor.authorOlarn Arpornchayanonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-18T02:24:32Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-18T02:24:32Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn22121374en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85058530192en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.jbo.2018.100210en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85058530192&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63710-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Authors Purpose: To assess the failure rate and mode failure of high-grade osteosarcoma patients who received extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation (ECIR) in extremities. Patients and Methods: For the cohort study, patients who had received ECIR at a single institution between January 1996 and December 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. Characteristics of failure and time to failure were recorded and analyzed. In addition, a systematically search of published literatures regarding the use of ECIR for osteosarcoma was conducted. Failure rates and modes of failure were determined from the pooled data. Results: In the cohort study, the overall reconstruction failure was 46% (23 of 50 cases) of which 6% were due to mechanical failure, and 40% were due to non-mechanical failure. In the systematic review, 164 cases reached the criteria for analysis (50 diaphysis, 97 osteochondral of lower extremity, 6 knee resection, and 11 proximal humerus resection). Among those cases, overall failure rate was 29.9% (49 of 164 cases) of which 7.9% were due to mechanical failure, and 22.0% to non-mechanical failure. Diaphyseal resection with intercalary re-implantation had a significantly lower failure rate than osteochondral reconstruction of lower extremity (OR: 2.7, p < 0.02), and knee extra-articular resection osteochondral re-implantation (OR: 10.5, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Diaphyseal resection and extracorporeal irradiation of intercalary re-implantation offer the most promising outcome among other type of reconstructions. Availability of graft, fewer structural complications, and biological permanence are advantages of this reconstruction method.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleSurgical outcomes of extracorporeal irradiation and re-implantation in extremities for high grade osteosarcoma: A retrospective cohort study and a systematic review of the literatureen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Bone Oncologyen_US
article.volume14en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSamitivej Hospital (Sukhumvit)en_US
article.stream.affiliationsBangkok Hospital Chiang Maien_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.