Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63593
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRavi Lonkanien_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-18T02:21:28Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-18T02:21:28Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn18736173en_US
dc.identifier.issn15660141en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85058053064en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ememar.2018.11.012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85058053064&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/63593-
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier B.V. This study examines whether firms with female executives forecast company earnings more conservatively. Consistent with the selectivity hypothesis, the results reveal firms with female CEOs tend to make conservative earnings forecasts in a perceived positive situation and firms with a higher percentage of female directors on the board are more likely to forecast earnings conservatively in a perceived negative situation. The conservativeness of female executives is not caused by lower management ability. This conservative behavior is not caused by personal factors such as military status, level of education, or area of study.en_US
dc.subjectBusiness, Management and Accountingen_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.titleGender differences and managerial earnings forecast bias: Are female executives less overconfident than male executives?en_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleEmerging Markets Reviewen_US
article.volume38en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.