Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62365
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChalerm Liwsrisakunen_US
dc.contributor.authorChaicharn Pothiraten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-11T09:26:16Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-11T09:26:16Z-
dc.date.issued2005-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-25144465407en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=25144465407&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/62365-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To determine the clinical impact of Thai Asthma Guideline implementation. Material and Method: A nationwide written questionnaire survey was used for 365 Thai physicians who were involved in routine asthma practice. The questionnaire consisted of two questions; the first concerning the criteria to define steps of asthma severity (16 parameters) and the second concerning controller use in each step of asthma severity, focusing on the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Results: Of 272 physicians (74.5%) who responded to the questionnaire; 21, 76 and 175 were chest physicians, general practitioners (internists), and general doctors, respectively. All the non-responders could not provide answers to the questionnaire because they were unable to remember them all. More than 12 out of 16 parameters in the first question were filled out correctly by only 14%, 4% and 5% of chest physicians, general practitioners and general doctors, respectively, whereas fewer than 5 out of 16 parameters were answered correctly by 33%, 66% and 71% of these physicians, respectively. The most common parameters answered incorrectly by general doctors were FEV 1 and PEF variability. ICS was the most common controller used in controlling each step of persistent asthma. However, only 46.8% of general doctors prescribed it for the management of mild persistent asthma. Conclusion: The Thai Asthma Guideline is impractical for clinical practice implementation, due to complicated severity grading and a very low rate of lung function tests for grading asthma severity. Although ICS is the most common controller prescribed, its use is still far from optimal in Thailand. The authors suggest that the Thai asthma guideline should be simplified and aimed towards optimal ICS use among generalists.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleActual implementation of the Thai Asthma Guidelineen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of the Medical Association of Thailanden_US
article.volume88en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.