Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorB. Ekasinghen_US
dc.contributor.authorR. A. Letcheren_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the necessity, successes and failures of attempts to embed socioeconomic aspects into integrated natural resource modeling. It uses experiences in Thailand over the last 20-30 years to illustrate advances and difficulties in this integration. The paper highlights strengths, weaknesses and the effectiveness of different approaches which are used to incorporate socioeconomic dynamic processes and impacts. Lessons learnt from Thai experiences starting from systems thinking and approaches through to attempts to model agricultural and watershed systems for management are reviewed. Historically successes in integrating socioeconomic dimensions with biophysical analyses lie most often in interaction with agricultural and natural resource economists who have more experience dealing with quantitative methods and "hard" numerical approaches than other social scientists. The need for the "soft" side of assessment is recognized but is not easily realized. Failures to include the perspectives of anthropologists, psychologists and sociologists in integrated assessments have been caused by departmental boundaries, inadequate linkages between social theories and differences in the agendas of these fields. Different approaches to the treatment of socioeconomic variables and processes are highlighted. Modeling approaches, such as agent-based systems or multi-agent systems are more tuned to socioeconomic concerns but must first pass the test of acceptability by policy makers who are used to top-down, simplified approaches to solving problems. Balancing, or even better, integrating "hard" and "soft" systems approaches will improve the relevance and validity of the models to solve agricultural/natural resource problems.en_US
dc.subjectDecision Sciencesen_US
dc.titleSuccesses and failures of attempts to embed socioeconomic dimensions in modeling for integrated natural resource management: Lessons from Thailanden_US
dc.typeConference Proceedingen_US
article.title.sourcetitleMODSIM05 - International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Advances and Applications for Management and Decision Making, Proceedingsen_US Mai Universityen_US National Universityen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.