Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61701
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLouis Lebelen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn M. Anderiesen_US
dc.contributor.authorBruce Campbellen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarl Folkeen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteve Hatfield-Doddsen_US
dc.contributor.authorTerry P. Hughesen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames Wilsonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-11T08:57:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-11T08:57:25Z-
dc.date.issued2006-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn17083087en_US
dc.identifier.issn17083087en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-33745888401en_US
dc.identifier.other10.5751/ES-01606-110119en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33745888401&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61701-
dc.description.abstractThe sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: (1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; (2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and (3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom? Copyright © 2006 by the author(s).en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Scienceen_US
dc.titleGovernance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systemsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleEcology and Societyen_US
article.volume11en_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsArizona State Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsCharles Darwin Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsStockholms universiteten_US
article.stream.affiliationsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organizationen_US
article.stream.affiliationsJames Cook University, Australiaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Maineen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.