Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61312
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhilip C.W. Luien_US
dc.contributor.authorGary M.K. Tseen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoon Tan Puayen_US
dc.contributor.authorGita Jayaramen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas C. Puttien_US
dc.contributor.authorBenjaporn Chaiwunen_US
dc.contributor.authorNorman H.L. Chanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatrick P.L. Lauen_US
dc.contributor.authorLing Mak Kongen_US
dc.contributor.authorAye T. Khinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T04:08:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T04:08:28Z-
dc.date.issued2007-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn00219746en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-34249882461en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1136/jcp.2006.039412en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34249882461&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61312-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast encompasses a heterogeneous group of tumours with variable components of sarcomatoid, squamous or poorly differentiated carcinomas. Aim: To review a series of 19 cytological preparations of metaplastic carcinomas to assess diagnostic cytological features. Methods: 17 cases of fine-needle aspirates of histologically proven metaplastic carcinomas (4 monophasic spindle cell carcinomas, 4 squamous cell carcinomas and 11 biphasic tumours) were reviewed, with an emphasis on the presence of poorly differentiated carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, atypical spindle cells, benign stromal fragments and necrosis. Results: All cases were diagnosed as malignant, with 68% of cases showing moderate to high cellularity, and 47% showing necrosis. If the tumours were analysed according to the constituting components histologically, 7, 15 and 8 cases, respectively, possess poorly differentiated carcinoma cells, sarcomatoid malignant cells and squamous carcinoma cells, whereas these components were cytologically identified in 11, 10 and 7 cases, respectively. Dual tumour populations were identified in only 5 of the 11 biphasic carcinomas in the cytological preparations; and the stromal material was cytologically identified in the only case with chondroid stroma. Conclusions: Identification of metaplastic carcinoma in cytology remains problematic. There seems to be morphological overlap between various components. The identification of dual components, unequivocal squamous carcinoma cells and chondroid stroma is helpful for diagnosis, but it is uncommon. The presence of poorly differentiated carcinoma cells with a suggestion of focal spindle morphology is another clue to the suggestion of metaplastic carcinoma.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleFine-needle aspiration cytology of metaplastic carcinoma of the breasten_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleJournal of Clinical Pathologyen_US
article.volume60en_US
article.stream.affiliationsPrince of Wales Hospital Hong Kongen_US
article.stream.affiliationsSingapore General Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsUniversity of Malayaen_US
article.stream.affiliationsNational University Hospital, Singaporeen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsKwong Wah Hospitalen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.