Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61246
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorP. Chetchotisakden_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Anunnatsirien_US
dc.contributor.authorP. Mootsikapunen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Kiertiburanakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Anekthananonen_US
dc.contributor.authorC. Bowonwatanuwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Kowadisaiburanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Supparatpinyoen_US
dc.contributor.authorK. Ruxrungthamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T04:07:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T04:07:25Z-
dc.date.issued2007-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn14681293en_US
dc.identifier.issn14642662en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-35448967037en_US
dc.identifier.other10.1111/j.1468-1293.2007.00506.xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=35448967037&origin=inwarden_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61246-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Long-term nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based antiretroviral treatment failure in most developing countries has led to broad cross-resistance within NNRTI and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) classes. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and tolerability of a double boosted protease inhibitor (PI) regimen in this setting. Methods: A total of 64 HIV-infected patients who had failed NNRTI-based regimens were randomized to receive either lopinavir/saquinavir/ ritonavir [LPV/SQV/r; 400/1000/100 mg twice a day (bid)] alone or indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/r; 800/100 mg bid) plus two NRTIs optimized with genotypic drug resistance guidance. Patients who had no available optimized NRTI backbone were allocated to the LPV/SQV/r arm. Results: At 48 weeks, the percentages of patients with plasma viral load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL were 60% (31 of 52 patients) in the LPV/SQV/r arm vs 50% (six of 12) in the IDV/r/2NRTIs arm in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 61% (31 of 51) vs 71% (five of seven), respectively, in the as-treated analysis. The median (interquartile range) increases in absolute CD4 cell count from baseline were 177 (91-269) and 100 (52-225) cells/μL in the LPV/SQV/r and IDV/ r/2NRTIs groups, respectively (P = 0.32). Four of 12 patients (33%) in the IDV/r/2NRTIs group experienced severe nausea and vomiting and four patients (8%) in the LPV/SQV/r group had significant hepatitis. Conclusions: LPV/SQV/r and high-dose boosted IDV were not well tolerated and led to <65% ITT virological efficacy outcomes. A randomized larger scale study with new formulations and/or more tolerable boosted PIs in NNRTI-based failure is warranted. © 2007 British HIV Association.en_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and tolerability of a double boosted protease inhibitor (lopinavir + saquinavir/ritonavir) regimen in HIV-infected patients who failed treatment with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitorsen_US
dc.typeJournalen_US
article.title.sourcetitleHIV Medicineen_US
article.volume8en_US
article.stream.affiliationsKhon Kaen Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsMahidol Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChonburi Regional Hospitalen_US
article.stream.affiliationsBamrasnaradura Infectious Disease Instituteen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChiang Mai Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsChulalongkorn Universityen_US
article.stream.affiliationsThe HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaborationen_US
Appears in Collections:CMUL: Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.