Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61029
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Derek T. Robinson | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Daniel G. Brown | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dawn C. Parker | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pepijn Schreinemachers | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Marco A. Janssen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Marco Huigen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Heidi Wittmer | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nick Gotts | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Panomsak Promburom | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Elena Irwin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas Berger | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Franz Gatzweiler | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cécile Barnaud | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-10T04:02:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-10T04:02:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007-01-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 17474248 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1747423X | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-84907435668 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1080/17474230701201349 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84907435668&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://cmuir.cmu.ac.th/jspui/handle/6653943832/61029 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The use of agent-based models (ABMs) for investigating land-use science questions has been increasing dramatically over the last decade. Modelers have moved from ‘proofs of existence’ toy models to case-specific, multi-scaled, multi-actor, and data-intensive models of land-use and land-cover change. An international workshop, titled ‘Multi-Agent Modeling and Collaborative Planning—Method2Method Workshop’, was held in Bonn in 2005 in order to bring together researchers using different data collection approaches to informing agent-based models. Participants identified a typology of five approaches to empirically inform ABMs for land use science: sample surveys, participant observation, field and laboratory experiments, companion modeling, and GIS and remotely sensed data. This paper reviews these five approaches to informing ABMs, provides a corresponding case study describing the model usage of these approaches, the types of data each approach produces, the types of questions those data can answer, and an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of those data for use in an ABM. © 2007, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. | en_US |
dc.subject | Earth and Planetary Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | Environmental Science | en_US |
dc.subject | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of empirical methods for building agent-based models in land use science | en_US |
dc.type | Journal | en_US |
article.title.sourcetitle | Journal of Land Use Science | en_US |
article.volume | 2 | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | George Mason University, Fairfax Campus | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Universitat Hohenheim | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Arizona State University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | The James Hutton Institute | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Chiang Mai University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Ohio State University | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | University of Bonn Center for Development Research | en_US |
article.stream.affiliations | Universite Paris Nanterre | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | CMUL: Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in CMUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.